SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

PETER GATHUITA v RUARAKA HOUSING CO. LTD & 2 others [2006] KEHC 2392 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2392 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2392
Citation
[2006] KEHC 2392 (KLR)
Decided
30 May 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureDefendants' application for dismissal of the suit for want of prosecutionCoramFRED A. OCHIENG
Holding

The application dated 13th January 2005 is dismissed. The plaintiff's estate is required to take steps to ensure the plaintiff is duly substituted, the 2nd defendant is served with the summons, and the 1st defendant's costs are paid within three months.

Facts

The plaintiff passed away in February 2006, and his advocate requested an opportunity to proceed with the case. The plaintiff's advocate filed several applications and applications for substituted service, but the suit was dismissed due to lack of prosecution.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's death should affect the dismissal of the suit
  2. Whether the plaintiff's estate should be given an opportunity to prosecute the suit

Reasoning

The court was inclined to grant the prayers sought but decided against it due to the recent demise of the plaintiff. The court held that justice must be fair to all parties and directed the plaintiff's estate to take steps to prosecute the suit.

Outcome

The application for dismissal of the suit is dismissed.

Orders

  • The application dated 13th January 2005 is dismissed.
  • The plaintiff's estate is required to take steps to ensure the plaintiff is duly substituted.
  • The 2nd defendant is served with the summons to enter appearance, together with the Plaint.
  • The 1st defendant's costs, assessed at KShs. 2,000/=, are to be paid by the plaintiff's estate within three months.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case