SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KARIUKI KIRUBI v M.C.M & ANOTHER [2006] KEHC 3356 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 3356 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3356
Citation
[2006] KEHC 3356 (KLR)
Decided
1 September 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypecivilPostureappeal from a judgmentCoramJ.K. SERGON
Holding

The court grants an order of stay of execution of the judgment for 6 months pending the filing and service of a notice of appeal and the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The plaintiff, Kariuki Kirubi, filed a suit against the defendants, M.C.M and Stephen Muange Mutua, regarding a judgment that canceled their land title. The defendants sought a stay of execution of the judgment and an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal.

Issues

  1. whether the defendants were served with a judgment notice
  2. whether the defendants can file a notice of appeal within the time limit
  3. whether the defendants should provide security for the due performance of the decree

Reasoning

The court extended time for the defendants to file and serve a notice of appeal due to the defendants' lack of service with a judgment notice and the likelihood of substantial loss if the stay is not granted.

Outcome

The plaintiff/respondent is granted an order of stay of execution of the judgment for 6 months.

Orders

  • An order of stay of execution of the judgment for 6 months pending the filing and service of a notice of appeal and the hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • The applicant is granted a sum of Kshs.100,000 as security for the due performance of the decree within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
  • The applicant is granted leave to file a notice of appeal out of time within the next 30 days.

Remedies

  • stay of execution of the judgment for 6 months

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Court of Appeal Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case