SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

HELLEN WANJUGU KIAGAYU & another v ROBERT KIBIRI WOKABI & another [2006] KEHC 638 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 638 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
638
Citation
[2006] KEHC 638 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous orderCoramB.P. KUBO
Holding

The court refuses prayers 2 and 3 in the chamber summons application dated 16.11.06 and proceeds to deliver its ruling on the chamber summons dated 25.05.06.

Facts

The plaintiff/applicant filed a chamber summons application dated 16.11.06, seeking to stop the intended interested parties from being joined as interested parties to the suit. The intended interested parties had previously filed a chamber summons application dated 25.05.06.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff/applicant should be allowed to stop the intended interested parties from being joined as interested parties to the suit.
  2. Whether the court should defer its ruling on the chamber summons application dated 25.05.06.

Reasoning

The court finds no good reason for further deferring the ruling due to the omissions of the plaintiff/applicant and/or her counsel, and the material placed before the court by the intended interested parties.

Outcome

The court refuses prayers 2 and 3 in the chamber summons application dated 16.11.06 and proceeds to deliver its ruling on the chamber summons dated 25.05.06.

Orders

  • The court refuses prayers 2 and 3 in the chamber summons application dated 16.11.06.
  • The court proceeds to deliver its ruling on the chamber summons dated 25.05.06.

Remedies

  • The court will now proceed to deliver its ruling on the chamber summons dated 25.05.06.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case