SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ENGINERING MANUFACTURERS LIMITED v MARSHALL-FOWLER (ENGINEERS) LIMITED [2006] KEHC 771 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 771 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
771
Citation
[2006] KEHC 771 (KLR)
Decided
16 November 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureChambers Summons brought by the plaintiff under order XXXVI Rules 8A and 12 of Civil Procedure RulesCoramMARY KASANGO
Holding

The court finds no reason why the orders sought by the plaintiff should not be granted as prayed. The case shall proceed by way of affidavit evidence on record, be heard in Nairobi for one day, and the costs of the chamber summons dated 30th of May 2006 shall be in the cause.

Facts

The plaintiff, Engineering Manufacturers Limited, sought directions for the conduct of an Originating Summons. The application was supported by an affidavit of the Managing Director of the plaintiff's company, which stated that it would be reasonable and expedient to proceed with the hearing of the originating summons on the basis of the affidavits already on record. The supporting affidavit had annexed documents in issue, including contractual agreements and arbitral clauses. The present action sought the court's determination on whether the applicant and the defendant agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration and whether the dispute was liable for arbitration.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant and the defendant agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration.
  2. Whether the dispute was liable for arbitration.

Reasoning

The court rejected the request for cross examination of the deponent of the affidavit in support of the application. The court found that the defendant did not file an affidavit in response to the application showing why it was necessary for the court to give an order for cross examination of the deponent. The court therefore granted the orders sought by the plaintiff.

Outcome

The plaintiff's application was granted.

Orders

  • This case shall proceed by way of affidavit evidence on record.
  • This case shall be heard in Nairobi for one day.
  • The costs of the chamber summons dated 30th of May 2006 shall be in the cause.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case