SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC v CHAIRMAN MWEA L.D.T & 3 OTHERS [2007] KEHC 1010 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1010 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1010
Citation
[2007] KEHC 1010 (KLR)
Decided
10 July 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneousPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramJ. N. KHAMINWA
Holding

The court ordered the eviction of the 3rd and 4th Respondents from Rice Holding No. 1620 and granted exclusive possession to the applicant. The court also ordered M/s Quickline Auctioneers to carry out the eviction and the OCS Wang’uru to provide security during the eviction.

Facts

The applicant, Patrick Waweru Munyi, seeks orders to forcibly remove the 3rd and 4th Respondents, Sophia Wambura Munyi and Isaac Muriuki Munyi, from Rice Holding No. 1620 within Mwea Section Irrigation Scheme, and to put him in exclusive possession of the land. The applicant also requests eviction by M/s Quickline Auctioneers and security from the OCS Wang’uru during the eviction.

Issues

  1. Eviction of the 3rd and 4th Respondents from Rice Holding No. 1620
  2. Exclusive possession of the Rice holding by the applicant
  3. Eviction by M/s Quickline Auctioneers
  4. Security from the OCS Wang’uru during the eviction

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant had a valid claim and that the eviction was necessary to protect his rights.

Outcome

The court granted the orders sought by the applicant.

Orders

  • Eviction of the 3rd and 4th Respondents from Rice Holding No. 1620
  • Granting exclusive possession to the applicant
  • Eviction by M/s Quickline Auctioneers
  • Security from the OCS Wang’uru during the eviction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case