SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

C.Y.O OWAYO v GEORGE HANNINGTON ZEPHANIA ADUDA T/A ADUDA AUCTIONEERS & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 1390 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1390 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1390
Citation
[2007] KEHC 1390 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of KenyaCoramE.O O'KUBASU, J.W. ONYANGO OTIENO, W.S. DEVERELL
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the superior court is set aside. The appellant is awarded Ksh.710,000/= plus interest, and costs of the appeal and of the superior court are awarded to the appellant.

Facts

C.Y.O. Owayo was a tenant in a business premises owned by South Nyanza Teachers Co-operative Savings & Credit Society Limited (Sonyaco) in Homa Bay. The tenancy ended, and Owayo was in arrears of Ksh.90,600/=. Sonyaco wrote to G.S. Okoth & Co. Advocates demanding the arrears plus interest. The second respondent authorized the first respondent to proceed with the levy of distress, but the goods were taken by the first respondent. Owayo claimed special and general damages.

Issues

  1. Was the levy of distress by the first respondent authorized by the second respondent?
  2. Was the first respondent entitled to take the goods?
  3. Was the first respondent's action illegal and reckless?

Reasoning

The second respondent authorized the first respondent to demand rent from the tenant, Claris Owayo. However, the first respondent proceeded with the levy of distress without following the proper legal procedures, which was illegal and reckless.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment for the appellant in the total sum of Ksh.710,000/= plus interest at court rates from 10th May 1999.
  • Order that costs of the appeal and of the superior court be awarded to the appellant.

Remedies

  • Special and general damages for trespass to goods.
  • Exemplary damages of Ksh.10,000/=
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case