SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

DICKSON CHERUIYOT CHEPKWONY v DANIEL KIPKOECH MARITIM & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 1444 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1444 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1444
Citation
[2007] KEHC 1444 (KLR)
Decided
22 March 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplicant seeks interlocutory injunction to restrain the 2nd respondent from dealing with the suit land pending the hearing and determination of the suit.CoramL. KIMARU
Holding

The 1st respondent fraudulently registered as the owner of the suit land and charged it to the 2nd respondent to defeat any claim that could have been made by the deceased or her successors. The 2nd respondent is restrained from dealing with the suit land, including exercising its statutory power of sale as a chargee, pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Facts

The applicant, Dickson Cheruiyot Chepkwony, is the administrator of the estate of Chemarus Chepkorir Maina, deceased. The 1st respondent, Daniel Kipkoech Maritim, fraudulently registered as the owner of the suit land, Kericho/Kebeneti/276, and charged it to the 2nd respondent, National Bank of Kenya.

Issues

  1. Ownership dispute over the suit land
  2. Fraudulent registration by the 1st respondent

Reasoning

The court found prima facie evidence of fraudulent registration and the subsequent charge of the suit land, leading to the conclusion that the 2nd respondent was duped by the 1st respondent.

Outcome

The applicant's application for the interlocutory orders of injunction is allowed.

Orders

  • The 2nd respondent is restrained from dealing with the suit land, including exercising its statutory power of sale as a chargee, pending the hearing and determination of the originating summons filed by the applicant.

Remedies

  • Interlocutory injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case