SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MARK GERALD BRIERLEY & 2 OTHERS v DRIFTWOOD BEACH CLUB LTD [2007] KEHC 1740 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1740 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1740
Citation
[2007] KEHC 1740 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at MalindiCoramN.R.O. OMBI
Holding

The preliminary objection that the High Court has original jurisdiction to deal with landlord-tenant relationship is dismissed.

Facts

The plaintiffs purchased shares in a diving center and took over its operations. The defendant, the landlord, sent a notice to vacate the premises, which the plaintiffs rejected. The plaintiffs filed a suit claiming damages and seeking an injunction.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court has original jurisdiction to deal with landlord-tenant relationship
  2. Whether the plaintiffs are tenants or licensees in respect of the suit premises

Reasoning

The court found that the basic issue is whether the plaintiffs are tenants or licensees in respect of the suit premises. The facts regarding the actual relationship between the parties have to be ascertained by adducing evidence at the hearing.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (8)
  • MAWANLY – VS – CHATERS (1977) 3 ALL.ER 918
  • TIWI BEACH HOTEL LTD & JULIANE ULRIKE STAMM & CALEDONIA SUPERMARKET LTD – VS – KENYA NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (2000) 2 EA – 257
  • MUKHISA BISCUIT – VS – WEST END DISTRIBUTORS LTD (1969) EA 69
  • PARKLANDS PROPERTIES – VS – PATEL (1981) KLR Page 52
  • SAHEB – VS – HASSANLY (1984) KLR 186
  • MUKHISA BISCUIT – VS – WEST END DISTRIBUTORS (1969) (supra)
  • PARKLANDS PROPERTIES – VS – PATEL (1981) KLR Page 52
  • SAHEB – VS – HASSANLY (1984) KLR 186
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case