SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

DICKSON ELIJAH NGUMI WAICHUHI v KAHAWA SUKARI LIMITED & 2 others [2007] KEHC 2086 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2086 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2086
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2086 (KLR)
Decided
29 May 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramM.A. Ang'awa
Holding

A temporary injunction is issued restraining the 3rd defendant from parting with the possession and/or transferring the suit premises to his name or any other person's name until the determination of the suit.

Facts

The plaintiff, Dickson Elijah Nguni Waichuki, was allocated land by the defendant, Kahawa Sukari Ltd., in 1989. In 1997, the same land was allocated to the 2nd defendant, Eunice Njoki Ngunjiri. Ngunjiri then sold the land to the 3rd defendant, Moses Nyongesa, who constructed a house on the land.

Issues

  1. Ownership of land LR Ruiru Kiu Block 3/94
  2. Injunction to restrain the 3rd defendant from parting with possession of the land pending determination of the suit

Reasoning

The plaintiff made a prima facie case that his rights to the suit land may be infringed, and there has been no land transfer made to the 3rd defendant. The court held that pending the determination of the suit, an injunction should issue to restrain the 3rd defendant.

Outcome

The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.

Orders

  • Injunction to issue restraining the 3rd defendant from parting with possession of land LR Ruiru Kiu Block 3/94 pending determination of the suit.
  • Application for prayers against the 2nd defendant dismissed as the suit against the 2nd defendant was discontinued.

Remedies

  • Injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case