SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MARTIN MUIRURI NDUNG’U & ANOTHER v HOUSING FINANCE OF KENYA & 2 OTHERS [2007] KEHC 2224 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2224 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2224
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2224 (KLR)
Decided
22 February 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) dismissing the plaintiffs' application for an injunction.CoramFRED A. OCHIENG
Holding

The plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case against the defendants for fraud and sale at an undervalue. The subject matter of the suit is preserved until the suit is heard and determined. The 2nd and 3rd defendants are restrained from any further dealings with the suit property until the suit is heard and determined.

Facts

The plaintiffs bought a property for KShs. 3,400,000, with the defendant Housing Finance of Kenya financing KShs. 1,840,000. The plaintiffs executed a legal charge on the property. The defendant re-scheduled the loan in November 2005, but the plaintiffs were unaware of the sale of the property until a letter from the 2nd and 3rd defendants asked them to vacate the property. The plaintiffs sought an injunction to restrain the defendants from dealing with the property.

Issues

  1. Whether the sale of the property was illegal, null and void.
  2. Whether the defendants were guilty of fraud and misrepresentation.
  3. Whether the plaintiffs should be restrained from dealing with the property until the suit is heard and determined.

Reasoning

The plaintiffs' assertion that the sale was illegal, null and void is not supported by evidence. However, the plaintiffs have made a prima facie case for fraud and sale at an undervalue. The defendants' sale of the property was not in accordance with the statutory notice, which could be interpreted as allowing the defendant to realise the security without giving a new statutory notice.

Outcome

The plaintiffs' application for an injunction is granted.

Orders

  • The 2nd and 3rd defendants are restrained from any further dealings with the suit property until the suit is heard and determined.
  • The 1st defendant is directed to either convert the plaintiffs' account into an interest-earning account or place the funds therein to another interest-earning account.

Remedies

  • Injunction to restrain the defendants from dealing with the property until the suit is heard and determined.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Transfer of Property Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case