SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

AMOS MUTHINJA M’MUTUA v REPUBLIC [2007] KEHC 2268 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2268 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2268
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2268 (KLR)
Decided
13 June 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Criminal ApplicationPostureAppeal from a decision of the Subordinate CourtCoramJ.B. Ojwang, Makhandia, Amos Muthin
Holding

The court quashes the forfeiture of the accused's cash bail, sets aside the order for a new cash bail, and orders the accused's immediate release with the condition of regular attendance in court.

Facts

The accused was released on a cash bail of Kshs.150,000/= in Nairobi Criminal Case No.2127 of 2006. He was unable to attend his mention on 11th December, 2006 due to travel. The court issued a warrant of arrest and ordered forfeiture of the bail.

Issues

  1. The court's orders were made without the accused's or his advocate's presence
  2. The court's orders were made in a prejudicial manner towards the accused

Reasoning

The court found that the orders were made without the accused's or his advocate's presence and in a prejudicial manner, thus violating the accused's right to be heard.

Outcome

The court's orders from 28th May, 2007 are affirmed.

Orders

  • Forfeiture of the accused's cash bail of Kshs.150,000/= is quashed
  • The Subordinate Court's order requiring a new cash bail of Kshs.200,000/= is set aside
  • The accused shall forthwith be released from custody, subject to the condition that he shall attend Court regularly

Remedies

  • The accused's cash bail is restored
  • The accused is released from custody with the condition of regular attendance in court
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case