SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MAGITUANITEKI SELF GROUP v BONIFACE NJIRU T/A NJIRU BONIFACE & CO. ADVOCATES & KENDONG RANCH LTD [2007] KEHC 240 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 240 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
240
Citation
[2007] KEHC 240 (KLR)
Decided
15 March 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureDefendant seeks orders that a proper question of liability be tried between him and a third party, while the third party maintains there is no proper question to be tried.CoramH. M. OKWENGU
Holding

The court finds that the Plaintiff's claim against the Defendant is not linked to the Defendant's relationship with Kendong Ranch Limited. The court dismisses the third party from the proceedings and directs the Defendant to pursue his claim against the third party in a different suit.

Facts

The Plaintiff sued the Defendant for KShs. 5,000,000, claiming the Defendant held the money as a stakeholder in an agreement for the sale of land between Kendong Ranch Limited and the Plaintiff. The Defendant claimed indemnity or contribution from Kendong Ranch Limited.

Issues

  1. Whether there is a proper question of liability to be tried between the Defendant and Kendong Ranch Limited.
  2. Whether the Defendant had authority from Kendong Ranch Limited to act for the company in respect of the sale and whether H.C. Kimeria had authority to instruct the Defendant or act on behalf of the company.

Reasoning

The court notes that the transactions are different and relate to different people and different subject matter, and that the issues do not substantially involve the same subject matter as the Plaintiff's suit against the Defendant.

Outcome

Defendant's motion dismissed.

Orders

  • 3rd Party dismissed from proceedings.
  • Defendant to pursue claim against 3rd Party in a different suit.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case