SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NAPHUTALY KIBUTU KANYORO & 302 others v TELKOM KENYA LIMITED [2007] KEHC 2834 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2834 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2834
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2834 (KLR)
Decided
5 July 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureRespondent's preliminary objection to the Verifying Affidavits and supporting affidavitsCoramALNASHIR VISRAM
Holding

Verifying Affidavits are struck out as they were sworn before the Plaint came into existence, but the error does not go to the jurisdiction of the Court. Supporting affidavits are struck out due to the omission to declare the statements are true and made on oath.

Facts

Plaintiffs filed Chamber Summons applications dated 2nd March, 2007, and supporting affidavits, including Verifying Affidavits, which were sworn before the Plaintiffs came into existence.

Issues

  1. Whether the Verifying Affidavits are defective and should be struck out.
  2. Whether the omission to declare that the statements are true and made on oath renders the Affidavits incurably defective.

Reasoning

The Verifying Affidavits were sworn before the Plaint came into existence, making them defective. The omission to declare the statements are true and made on oath renders the Affidavits incompetent.

Outcome

Verifying Affidavits and supporting affidavits are struck out, but the applications are not dismissed.

Orders

  • Fresh Verifying Affidavits to be filed and served within 10 days, or the Plaints shall stand struck out.
  • Supporting affidavits are struck out with costs to the Respondent.

Remedies

  • Costs to the Respondent.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Saanun v. Commissioner of Lands & 5 Others
  • Agip (K) Ltd vs Jimmy Komo
  • Caspair Ltd v. Harry Gandy
  • Noormohamed Janmohamed v. Kassamali Virji Madhani
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case