SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NANCY JERUTO BOMETT v HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY LTD [2007] KEHC 2858 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2858 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2858
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2858 (KLR)
Decided
28 March 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for Temporary InjunctionCoramALNASHIR VISRAM
Holding

The Court allows the application for a temporary injunction, except for costs, as the Applicant has raised sufficient issues that need careful examination.

Facts

The Applicant Nancy Jeruto Bomett charged the suit property to the Respondent Housing Finance Company Ltd for a loan of Shs.378,000 with an interest rate of 16.5% per annum. The Respondent unilaterally increased the instalment to Shs.6,168 and the interest rate to 21% per annum, resulting in a total sum payable of Shs.1,090,733 as of 31st January, 2006.

Issues

  1. Whether the interest rate charged, together with 'interest on interest' and 'other' charges were lawful and in accordance with the mortgage instrument.
  2. Whether the Applicant has presented a prima facie case with a probability of success.

Reasoning

The Court finds that the Applicant has presented a prima facie case with a probability of success and that the suit property is her residential property, making damages an inadequate compensation. The balance of convenience tilts in her favour.

Outcome

The application for a temporary injunction is allowed.

Orders

  • Allow the application for a temporary injunction.
  • Except for costs, the application is allowed.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction to restrain the Respondent from selling the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the Appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Central Bank of Kenya Act
  • Banking Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case