SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

WORLD DUTY FREE COMPANY LIMITED T/A KENYA DUTY FREE COMPLEX v KENYA AIRPORTS AUTHORITY & 2 OTHERS [2007] KEHC 2863 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2863 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2863
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2863 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a final order striking out the plaintCoramBosire, D-E Law, J.B. Ojwang, Juma, Mwera, Njagi, ONYANGO, Okubasu, Onyango, Onyango Otieno, Ringer
Holding

The plaintiff's suit is struck out for being premature

Facts

The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants alleging breach of an agreement dated 27th April, 1989 as amended by the 11th May 1990 between the plaintiff and the Government of Kenya regarding the Duty Free complex at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport Nairobi and Moi Airport Mombasa. The 1st defendant offered to refer the dispute to arbitration but failed to select any arbitrator.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's suit was premature
  2. Whether the defendants had locus standi to attack the plaint

Reasoning

The court ruled that the legislative provisions are not for cosmetic value but to regulate conduct and should be obeyed. The procedure under Section 33(1) of the Kenya Airports Authority Act is a special and independent procedure not linked to the procedure under the Kenya Arbitration Act.

Outcome

The plaintiff's suit is struck out

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit dated 27.6.2006 and filed on 27.6.2006 be and is hereby ordered to be struck out for being premature with costs to the defendants

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya Airports Authority Act Cap.395 Laws of Kenya
  • Arbitration Act
Cases cited (1)
  • GIANT HOLDINGS LTD VERSUS KAA NAIROBI HCCC 694 OF 2003
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case