SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

THEODORE OTIENO KAMBOGO v NORWEGIAN PEOPLES AID [2007] KEHC 296 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 296 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
296
Citation
[2007] KEHC 296 (KLR)
Decided
2 March 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for dismissal of suit for want of prosecutionCoramNjagi
Holding

The Plaintiff's delay is excusable as it was caused by his efforts to resolve issues with his former advocates. The court refuses to dismiss the suit but conditions the Plaintiff to pay costs and set the suit for hearing within 15 days of the court diary opening.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Theodore Otieno Kambogo, filed a suit against the Defendant, Norwegian Peoples Aid, which was adjourned generally on 8th November 2004. The Plaintiff has not set the suit down for hearing since then, leading to the Defendant's application for dismissal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff's delay in setting the suit for hearing is inordinate and inexcusable.
  2. Whether the delay has prejudiced the Defendant's case.

Reasoning

The court finds the delay excusable due to the Plaintiff's efforts to resolve issues with his former advocates. The court also notes that the delay has not prejudiced the Defendant's case as other witnesses can be taken by affidavit.

Outcome

Application dismissed with conditions

Orders

  • The Plaintiff shall pay KShs. 15,000/00 in costs within 30 days of delivery of this ruling.
  • The Plaintiff shall set the suit for hearing within 15 days of the court diary opening for the year 2008.

Remedies

  • Compensation for costs and a further opportunity to set the suit for hearing.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Evidence Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Ruling of the court on 4th November 2003
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case