SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MOSES NGENYE KAHINDO v AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION [2007] KEHC 2980 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2980 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2980
Citation
[2007] KEHC 2980 (KLR)
Decided
1 February 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's suitCoramMARY KASANGO
Holding

The court finds that the plaintiff's suit fails and dismisses the case with costs to the defendant.

Facts

The plaintiff Moses Ngenye Kahindo contracted to buy Mr. Kogie's property, which was charged with the defendant Agricultural Finance Corporation. The plaintiff claimed the defendant breached the loan agreement and failed to deliver the loan as agreed.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant met the conditions of the loan agreement
  2. Whether the defendant disbursed the loan to the plaintiff
  3. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by varying the interest rate
  4. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not confirming the disbursement of the loan
  5. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement
  6. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not confirming the disbursement of the loan
  7. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement
  8. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement
  9. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement
  10. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement
  11. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement
  12. Whether the defendant breached the loan agreement by not fulfilling the condition of the loan agreement

Reasoning

The court found that the defendant met the conditions of the loan agreement, disbursed the loan to the plaintiff's account, and did not breach the agreement by varying the interest rate or not fulfilling the conditions. The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probability his case.

Outcome

Dismissal of the plaintiff's suit with costs to the defendant

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case