SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ABDILLAHI SHAIYA AHMED T/A CHANIA BUTCHERY & ANOTHER v J.F.C. MUNENE & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 3067 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3067 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3067
Citation
[2007] KEHC 3067 (KLR)
Decided
27 March 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPosturePreliminary Objection to an injunctionCoramR. NAMBUYE
Holding

The court rules that the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for an injunction between a landlord and tenant.

Facts

The first Defendant is the registered or beneficial owner of the suit property, and the Plaintiffs and another are tenants in the said premises for over 30 years. The second Defendant purported to give a statutory notice to the first Defendant to carry out repairs, and subsequently, the first Defendant purported to issue a statutory notice to the Plaintiffs to vacate the premises.

Issues

  1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the application for an injunction between a landlord and tenant.
  2. Whether the Business Premises Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant an injunction in a landlord and tenant dispute.

Reasoning

The court applies the reasoning from the Court of Appeal in Narshidas & Company Ltd v Nyali Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Services Ltd, stating that the superior court's jurisdiction is not ousted in matters of injunctions related to landlord and tenant disputes.

Outcome

The Preliminary Objection is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff applicant.

Remedies

  • Permanent Injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Business Premises Tribunal Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Narshidas & Company Ltd v Nyali Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Services Ltd (Nairobi CA 205/1995)
  • Republic v Nairobi Business Premises Rent Tribunal & Others Ex Parte Karasha (1979) KLR 147 RE; Hebtulla Properties Limited (1979) KLR 96
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case