SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KILIMANJARO SAFARI CLUB LIMITED v COUNTY COUNCIL OF OLKEJUADO & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 3240 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3240 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3240
Citation
[2007] KEHC 3240 (KLR)
Decided
15 February 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for injunction and preservatory orders pending arbitrationCoramHonourable Judge
Holding

The Court finds that there is a dispute within the meaning of the lease agreement and grants preservatory orders against the First Respondent for a period of three months, subject to the Applicant depositing Shs.37,433,314 in Court.

Facts

The Applicant and First Respondent entered into a lease agreement for a safari lodge and tented camp. Four years into the lease, the First Respondent entered into a new lease with a second respondent for the same land, which the Applicant claims breaches the terms of its lease.

Issues

  1. Whether the breach of the lease by the First Respondent constitutes a dispute within the meaning of the lease agreement
  2. Whether the Applicant can obtain preservatory orders pending arbitration

Reasoning

The Court acknowledges the urgency of the matter and the importance of the tourism sector. The Applicant's breach of rent obligations is noted, but the Court grants the injunction with a condition.

Outcome

The Court grants preservatory orders against the First Respondent pending arbitration.

Orders

  • Preservatory orders against the First Respondent for a period of three months
  • Condition: Applicant must deposit Shs.37,433,314 in Court within 30 days, with Shs.5,000,000 deposited by 16th February, 2007

Remedies

  • Preservatory orders pending arbitration
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case