SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mark Gerald Brierley & 2 others v Driftwood Beach Club Ltd [2007] KEHC 336 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 336 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
336
Citation
[2007] KEHC 336 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the Business Rent TribunalCoramN.R.O. OMBI
Holding

The preliminary objection fails and the plaintiffs' suit is allowed.

Facts

The plaintiffs purchased shares in a diving center and took over its operations. The defendant, the landlord, purported to alter the terms of the tenancy agreement without complying with the Landlord and Tenants (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments Act). The plaintiffs filed a suit claiming loss and damage and seeking an injunction.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs are tenants or licensees in respect of the suit premises.
  2. Whether the High Court has original jurisdiction to deal with landlord-tenant relationship.

Reasoning

The court dismissed the preliminary objection because the facts regarding the actual relationship between the parties have to be ascertained, and the disagreement as to the status of the plaintiffs and defendants with regard to the subject premises is necessary to ascertain the relationship between the parties.

Outcome

The plaintiffs' suit is allowed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenants (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments Act Cap 301) Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (6)
  • MAWANLY – VS – CHATERS (1977) 3 ALL.ER 918
  • TIWI BEACH HOTEL LTD & JULIANE ULRIKE STAMM & CALEDONIA SUPERMARKET LTD – VS – KENYA NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (2000) 2 EA – 257
  • MUKHISA BISCUIT – VS – WEST END DISTRIBUTORS LTD (1969) EA 69
  • PARKLANDS PROPERTIES – VS – PATEL (1981) KLR Page 52
  • SAHEB – VS – HASSANLY (1984) KLR 186
  • Preliminary objection is in the nature of what used to be a demurrer.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case