SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Municipal Council of Mombasa v Managing Director Kenya Railways Corporation [2007] KEHC 3591 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3591 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3591
Citation
[2007] KEHC 3591 (KLR)
Decided
29 June 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for Judicial ReviewCoramJ.K. SERGON
Holding

The motion is well-founded and allowed with costs to the applicant.

Facts

The Municipal Council of Mombasa sued the Kenya Railways Corporation for arrears of contributions in lieu of rates due to the applicant in respect of various properties owned by the Respondent. The Respondent paid a sum of Kshs.1,000,000/- and the total amount now unpaid is Kshs.31,379,147/50. The applicant applied for an order of mandamus to compel the Respondent to settle the decretal sum.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent has the duty to cause the debt to be settled pursuant to Section 88(a) of Cap.397 Laws of Kenya.
  2. Whether the motion is well-founded and should be allowed with costs to the applicant.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Respondent has the duty to cause the debt to be settled pursuant to Section 88(a) of Cap.397 Laws of Kenya. The court of Appeal in the case of Kenya National Examination Council vs Geoffrey G. Njoroge and 9 others stated that an order of mandamus will compel the performance of a public duty imposed on a person or body of persons by a statute.

Outcome

The motion is allowed with costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • Order of Mandamus

Remedies

  • Compulsory settlement of the decretal sum

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya National Examination Council vs Geoffrey G. Njoroge and 9 others C.A. No. 266 of 1996
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case