SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kipkorir v Langat & another (No 2) [2007] KEHC 3703 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3703 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3703
Citation
[2007] KEHC 3703 (KLR)
Decided
29 June 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureAppeal and ReviewCoramKoome
Holding

The application for review was dismissed as the remedy for the petitioner lay in the appeal. The court found that the application was defective for failure to include the order or decree sought to be reviewed, and that the court had no jurisdiction to review its own decision.

Facts

The petitioner, Kigen Luka Kipkorir, challenged the National Assembly Elections held on 27 December 2002 in Rongai parliamentary constituency. The petition was struck off by the court due to non-compliance with rule 4(1)(b) of the National Assembly Elections (Election Petition) Rules and errors in the name of the 2nd respondent.

Issues

  1. Whether the application for review was defective for failure to include the order or decree sought to be reviewed.
  2. Whether a court had powers to entertain the review application.
  3. Whether an Election Court had jurisdiction to review its own decision.
  4. Whether the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act and the Civil Procedure Rules could be imported into the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act and the Rules made there under.
  5. Whether the remedy for the petitioner lay in the appeal or review.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the application for review was not allowed under the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act and that the petitioner had chosen to file an appeal first. The court also stated that the remedy for the petitioner lay in the appeal.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Remedies

  • Appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap.21)
  • National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act (Cap.7)
Cases cited (7)
  • Kibaki v Moi & another (2008) 2 KLR (EP) 351; [2000] 1 EA 115
  • Uhuru Highway Development Limited v Central Bank of Kenya & 2 others [1998] KLR
  • Gulamhusein Mulla Jivanji & Taibaki Mulla Jivanji v Ebrahim Mulla Jivanji & Dambhai [1929-30] 12 KLR 41
  • Balinda v Kangwamu & another [1963] EA 557
  • Mutunga v Nguli & another (2008) 1 KLR (EP) 31
  • Yat Tung Investment Co Ltd v Duo Heng Bank Ltd [1975] AC 581
  • Pop In (Kenya) Ltd & 3 others vs Habib BankAG Zurich [1990] KLR 609
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case