SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

CHOGORIA TOWN COUNCIL v ALICE M. NYAGA (? 171 of 2001) [2007] KEHC 387 (KLR) (13 July 2007) (Ruling)

[2007] KEHC 387 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
387
Citation
[2007] KEHC 387 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file an appeal
Holding

The court dismissed the application, finding that the applicant's explanation for the delay was lacking and that the objection raised has merit.

Facts

The plaintiff, Chogoria Town Council, sought an extension of time to file an appeal to the High Court from the decision of the Eastern Province Land Dispute Appeal Committee. The application was filed on 11th April, 2002, and was purportedly allowed by consent on 18th April, 2002. The application was set aside on 26th April, 2007, and the hearing ordered to start de novo.

Issues

  1. Whether the provisions of Order 49 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act apply to matters under the Land Dispute Tribunal Act.
  2. Whether the Land Dispute Tribunal Act provides for extension of time to file an appeal to the High Court from the Appeals Committee.

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing the appeal, but found that the applicant's explanation for the delay was not credible. The court also noted that the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Civil Procedure Act apply to matters under the Land Dispute Tribunal Act.

Outcome

Application dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • Chamber Summons dated 10th April, 2002 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Land Dispute Tribunal Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co.Ltd V West End Distributors
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case