SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SARAFINA NCHOORO M’IKIARA v SABINA NCHABIRA M’MUTUNGA [2007] KEHC 422 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 422 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
422
Citation
[2007] KEHC 422 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPostureApplication for Inhibition and Order to Prevent InterferenceCorampresiding judge
Holding

The Respondent’s entitlement to one acre out of the deceased’s land parcel Nkuene/L.Mikumbune/1061 is valid and lawful, as it was adjudicated by the Chief Magistrate’s Court in LDT No. 31/2004.

Facts

The deceased, M’Ikiara M’Ritha, died on 5.9.2005. The Respondent, Sabina Nchabira M’Mutunga, had a land dispute with the deceased before the Meru Central Land Disputes Tribunal (LDT No. 31/2004). The LDT ordered that the Respondent should get one acre out of land parcel Nkuene/L.Mikumbune/1061 registered in the deceased’s name. The Applicant, Sarafina Nchooro M’Ikiara, claims that the Respondent is attempting to interfere with the estate by amending mutation forms.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent’s actions constitute intermeddling with the deceased’s estate
  2. Where exactly the one acre falls within the deceased’s land

Reasoning

The Respondent’s entitlement to one acre out of the deceased’s land parcel Nkuene/L.Mikumbune/1061 is valid and lawful, as it was adjudicated by the Chief Magistrate’s Court in LDT No. 31/2004. The Respondent cannot be said to have intermeddled with the estate contrary to the Law of Succession Act.

Outcome

The application for inhibition and order to prevent interference is dismissed.

Orders

  • The court dismisses the application for inhibition and order to prevent interference

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law of Succession Act
Cases cited (1)
  • CMCC LDT NO. 31/2004
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case