SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

EPHANTUS NJAGI P. KAMAITHA v KENBLEST LIMITED [2007] KEHC 458 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 458 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
458
Citation
[2007] KEHC 458 (KLR)
Decided
31 May 2007
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from a judgment on liability and quantum of damagesCoramJ. N. Khaminwa, Hon. Osiemo J.
Holding

The court awards the plaintiff Shs.1,618,000 in total damages, after deducting 15% for the plaintiff's liability.

Facts

The plaintiff, Ephantus Njagi Kamathai, is the personal representative of the deceased, Remson Gitonga Njagi, who died in a traffic accident on 30/6/2003. The defendant, Kenblest Limited, was the owner of vehicle KAJ 297. The plaintiff claims damages for pain and suffering, loss of expectation of life, dependency, and special damages.

Issues

  1. Quantum of damages for pain and suffering
  2. Quantum of damages for loss of expectation of life
  3. Quantum of damages for dependency
  4. Quantum of damages for special damages

Reasoning

The court reduces the proposed dependency value to Shs.9,000 per month and applies a multiplier of 15 years. The court allows funeral expenses and special damages.

Outcome

The plaintiff is awarded Shs.1,618,000 in total damages.

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of Shs.1,628,025
  • Interest at court rates
  • Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiff

Remedies

  • Damages awarded to the plaintiff

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law Reform Act Cap 26
  • Fatal Accidents Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Dolberly vs Goodwin
  • Harvey McGregor on Damages
  • Daunty vs Haji & another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case