SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ZEPHANIAH OJWANG OKANGA v THIKA CLOTH MILLS LTD [2008] KEHC 1036 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 1036 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1036
Citation
[2008] KEHC 1036 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypecivilPostureappeal from a judgment of Senior Principal MagistrateCoramH. M. OKWENGU
Holding

The court finds the dismissal wrongful and allows the appeal, setting aside the lower court's judgment.

Facts

Zephaniah Ojwang Okanga filed a suit against his former employer, Thika Cloths Mills Ltd, claiming wrongful dismissal and terminal benefits. The respondent admitted the employment but denied the dismissal was wrongful.

Issues

  1. wrongful dismissal
  2. terminal benefits including salary in lieu of notice, gratuity, and leave pay

Reasoning

The court found the dismissal was wrongful due to lack of evidence of gross misconduct and the respondent's admission of not giving notice or salary in lieu of notice. The court awarded the appellant two months salary in lieu of notice, 17 days salary, and 121⁄2 leave days, and gratuity at the rate of 14 days salary for each completed year of service.

Outcome

Appeal allowed, judgment set aside, and new judgment issued.

Orders

  • payment of Kshs.98,420 for two months salary in lieu of notice, 17 days salary, and 121⁄2 leave days
  • payment of gratuity at the rate of 14 days salary for each completed year of service for 22 years worked
  • judgment less the sum of Kshs.3,000
  • costs of the suit in the lower court and this appeal

Remedies

  • payment of Kshs.98,420
  • payment of gratuity
  • costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case