SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

DAVID KITETU KIMULI v CITY COUNCIL OF MAKUENI & another [2008] KEHC 1439 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 1439 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1439
Citation
[2008] KEHC 1439 (KLR)
Decided
28 July 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramSheikh Amin
Holding

The court held that the encroached parcel of land belongs to the plaintiff and should be returned to him.

Facts

The plaintiff, David Kitetu Kimuli, claimed encroachment of land by the City Council of Makueni and another. The dispute arose over the boundary between the plaintiff's land and the land owned by the Local Authority. The plaintiff's land was adjacent to the land owned by the Local Authority, which was divided by a road reserve.

Issues

  1. Whether the encroached parcel of land belongs to the plaintiff and should be returned
  2. Whether the Local Authority allowed its licensees to encroach onto the plaintiff's land

Reasoning

The court found that the Local Authority allowed its licensees to encroach onto the plaintiff's land, which was adjacent to the land owned by the Local Authority. The court also noted that the plaintiff's land was adjacent to the land owned by the Local Authority, which was divided by a road reserve.

Outcome

The court ordered the encroached parcel of land to be returned to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • The encroached parcel of land to be returned to the plaintiff

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Adjudication Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case