SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

AGA KHAN HEALTH SERVICE v AINEAH LIKUYANI NJIRAH [2008] KEHC 2236 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2236 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2236
Citation
[2008] KEHC 2236 (KLR)
Decided
22 July 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a ruling dismissing an application to strike out the plaintCoramO.K. MUTUNGI
Holding

The Plaintiff’s claim does not disclose a reasonable cause of action, and the Defendant’s application to strike out the plaint was not properly considered by the Subordinate Court.

Facts

The Respondent/Plaintiff, Aineah Likuyani Njirah, was an employee of the United Nations, Nairobi, who visited the Defendant/Respondent, Aga Khan Health Service, on 17/8/96 and 10/8/96 for medical attention. The Defendant wrote a letter falsely stating that the Plaintiff and his family did not visit the Defendant’s dental clinic on 13/8/96, leading to the Plaintiff’s employer terminating his employment.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff’s claim in the plaint discloses a reasonable cause of action
  2. Whether the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s hospital on 13/8/96

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiff was not a party to the medical scheme and thus could not claim against the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s own admission in the plaint that he did not visit the Defendant’s hospital on 13/8/96 was sufficient to dismiss the claim.

Outcome

Appeal successful, Ruling and order of the Resident Magistrate reversed, Plaintiff’s chamber summons allowed with costs to the Plaintiff.

Orders

  • Ruling and order of the Resident Magistrate reversed
  • Plaintiff’s chamber summons allowed with costs in favor of the Plaintiff

Remedies

  • Reversal of the Ruling and order of the Resident Magistrate
  • Allowance of the Plaintiff’s chamber summons with costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case