SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MWEA RICE GROWERS MULT-PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v NGENYE KARIUKI & another [2008] KEHC 2301 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2301 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2301
Citation
[2008] KEHC 2301 (KLR)
Decided
8 May 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for stay of execution of decree pending appealCoramJ. N. KHAMINWA
Holding

The court grants a stay of execution of the decree upon depositing Shs.1.5 million in an interest-earning account with a reputable bank in joint names of the plaintiff's and the respondents' advocates pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The plaintiff, MWEA Rice Growers Mult-Purpose Co-operative Society Ltd, seeks a stay of execution of a decree in the sum of Shs.3,293,465/= pending the hearing and determination of an appeal. The 1st respondent, Hon. Ngenye Kariuki, and the 2nd respondent, Loinge Ltd, have engaged an auctioneer to execute the decree.

Issues

  1. Substantial loss and ability of the decree holder to repay the money if the appeal is successful
  2. Reasonable delay in making the application

Reasoning

The court considered the authorities and the arguments advanced to support the decisions reached, concluding that the plaintiff may be granted a stay upon depositing the specified amount.

Outcome

The court grants a stay of execution of the decree pending the appeal.

Orders

  • Deposit Shs.1.5 million in an interest-earning account with a reputable bank in joint names of the plaintiff's and the respondents' advocates

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of the decree pending the appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Order 41 Rule 4 (1) and Order XLV111 Rule 5 Civil Procedure Code
Cases cited (3)
  • HCC at Meru Civil Appeal No. 3 of 2007
  • Alibhai Shariff & Sons Ltd vs Technical Trading Ltd
  • Lee Muthoga vs Habib Zerich Finance (K) Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case