SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KENYA FARMNUT MULTIPURPOSE,CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v JOSEPH NDUHIU GITURI [2004] [2008] KEHC 2499 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2499 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2499
Citation
[2008] KEHC 2499 (KLR)
Decided
20 May 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Resident MagistrateCoramH. M. OKWENGU
Holding

The appeal is allowed to the extent of disallowing the sum of Kshs.37,500 awarded to the respondent in respect of terminal benefits. The judgment in favour of the respondent in the sum of Kshs.150,000 is confirmed.

Facts

The respondent sued his former employer, Kenya Farmnut Cooperative Society Ltd, for unpaid salary arrears and accrued legal terminal benefits. The defendant admitted employing the respondent but denied owing any salary arrears or terminal dues.

Issues

  1. Description of the defendant in the plaint
  2. Unpaid salary for the months of April to September 2000
  3. Terminal dues for the respondent

Reasoning

The defendant was properly described in the plaint, and the respondent was employed by the defendant. The respondent's claim for unpaid salary for the months of April to September 2000 was proved. The defendant's former general manager's sweeping statement about releasing employees was not supported by evidence, and the respondent's move was not considered a termination of employment.

Outcome

Appeal allowed to the extent of disallowing terminal benefits, judgment confirmed in the sum of Kshs.150,000.

Orders

  • Judgment in favour of the respondent in the sum of Kshs.150,000
  • Costs in the lower court and interest thereon
  • Costs of this appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case