SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ELIJAH MBONDO MUSYOKI & 2 others v REPUBLIC [2008] KEHC 2911 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2911 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2911
Citation
[2008] KEHC 2911 (KLR)
Decided
20 May 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal Misc 7 of 2008PostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramISAAC LENAOLA
Holding

The court finds that the continued detention of the applicants was a violation of their constitutional rights and declares the trial a nullity.

Facts

The applicants were arrested on 18/11/2002 and charged with robbery with violence. They were taken to court on 4/12/2002, 2 days after the 14-day period stipulated in Section 72(3)(b) of the Constitution.

Issues

  1. whether the incarceration of the accused persons for 16 days at the police station before being arraigned before the court for plea was an infringement of their fundamental right as guaranteed under Section 72 (3) of the Constitution.
  2. whether the said violation of the accused’s fundamental right warrants the trial to be declared a nullity ab initio.

Reasoning

The court held that the applicants were not brought before a court within 14 days of their arrest, which is a violation of Section 72(3)(b) of the Constitution. The court found that the delay was unreasonable and that the Republic failed to prove that the applicants were brought before a court as soon as was reasonably practicable.

Outcome

The trial is declared a nullity and the applicants are ordered to be released.

Orders

  • The trial is declared a nullity and the applicants are ordered to be released.

Remedies

  • Release of the applicants.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Section 72 (3) of the Constitution
Cases cited (3)
  • Gerald Macharia Githuku vs R Cr. Appeal No. 119/2004
  • Ndede vs R (1991) KLR 567
  • Albanus Mwasia Mutua vs R Cr. Appeal No. 120/2004
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case