SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NASIR MOHAMED DOLAL v DUALE ADEN BARE & 2 OTHERS [2008] KEHC 3288 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 3288 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3288
Citation
[2008] KEHC 3288 (KLR)
Decided
12 May 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner seeks to strike out the petition for want of serviceCoramALNASHIR VISRAM
Holding

The Petition was not served upon the 1st Respondent within the period of time prescribed by law, and it is struck out, with costs to all the Respondents

Facts

The Petitioner was one of the candidates in the Parliamentary Elections for the National Assembly seat for the Dujis Constituency. He lost the election to the 1st Respondent, Duale Aden Bare, who was declared the winner by the Electoral Commission of Kenya. The Petitioner challenged the election result and sought to have the election of the 1st Respondent declared null and void.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petition was served on the 1st Respondent in accordance with the law
  2. Whether the Petition was presented and served within 28 days of the publication of the election result in the Kenya Gazette

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal has held that service of election petitions is 'personal' service, requiring actual physical service. The Petitioner and his Process Server went to the 1st Respondent's brother's house in the evening of 25th January, 2008, but the watchman testified that the papers were dropped under the gate, which the Court found did not constitute 'personal' service.

Outcome

Petition struck out

Orders

  • Petition struck out
  • Costs to all the Respondents

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act
  • Presidential and Parliamentary Elections Regulations
  • Election Offences Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case