CORNELIUS KAUNGUJA M’AKANE v DAVID KAILIKIA M’IMATHIU [2008] KEHC 3321 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 3321
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 3321 (KLR)
- Decided
- 28 April 2008
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for review of a previous judgmentCoramW. OUKO
Holding
The judgment is reviewed and the word 'appellant' where it appears in the judgment is substituted with the word 'respondent' and vice versa, except on the last paragraph page 2 line 1 of the judgment.
Facts
The appellant and respondent were misdescribed in the previous judgment. The appellant was referred to as the respondent and vice versa.
Issues
- Misdescription of parties in the previous judgment
Reasoning
The court found that the word 'appellant' was used instead of 'respondent' and that this was a mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, which the court is empowered to correct.
Outcome
The judgment is reviewed and the word 'appellant' is substituted with 'respondent' and vice versa.
Orders
- The word 'appellant' where it appears in the judgment is substituted with the word 'respondent' and vice versa, except on the last paragraph page 2 line 1 of the judgment.
Remedies
- Costs in the lower court awarded to the appellant.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…