SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

BETHWEL MUTAI v CHINA ROAD & BRIDGE CORPORATION [2008] KEHC 3418 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 3418 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3418
Citation
[2008] KEHC 3418 (KLR)
Decided
25 April 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPosturePlaintiff's Ex Parte SuitCoramF. AZANGALALA
Holding

The court awards the plaintiff Kshs. 800,000.00 in general damages and Kshs. 668,383.00 in special damages, totaling Kshs. 1,468,383.00.

Facts

The plaintiff, Bethwel Mutai, was knocked down by a vehicle driven by the defendant's employee, Mwangangi Mwoka Ndaka, while he was employed by the defendant. The plaintiff sustained multiple fractures and required medical treatment and surgery.

Issues

  1. Determination of damages for the plaintiff's injuries
  2. Award of special damages for medical costs and future medical treatment

Reasoning

The court considered the nature of the injuries and the plaintiff's testimony, awarding a sum of Kshs. 800,000.00 in general damages and Kshs. 668,383.00 in special damages.

Outcome

Plaintiff wins

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded Kshs. 800,000.00 in general damages
  • Plaintiff awarded Kshs. 668,383.00 in special damages
  • Plaintiff awarded Kshs. 1,468,383.00 in total damages

Remedies

  • Plaintiff awarded Kshs. 1,468,383.00 in total damages
  • Plaintiff awarded costs of the suit and interest

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Esther Wanjiru Kiarie – v – Joseph Kiarie Nganga HCC No. 384 of 2000 (UR) Visram J. awarded Kshs. 1,000,000.00 for pain suffering and loss of amenities for the plaintiff who had sustained the following injuries: a) Fracture of the left humerus. b) Fracture of the right tibia and fibula. c) Fracture of the socket of the left hip. d) Dislocation of the left hip joint. e) Crash injury to the right ring finger. f) Avulsion to the distal end of the finger.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case