RUSTAM HIRA v DELPHIS BANK LTD [2008] KEHC 542 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 542
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 542 (KLR)
- Decided
- 3 November 2008
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous MotionPostureApplication for execution of taxed bill of costs and interestCoramJOYCE N. KHAMINWA
Holding
The application is dismissed with costs to the defendant
Facts
The plaintiff sought judgment in the sum of Kshs. 203,428.91 for taxed bill of costs and interest at 14% p.a. The defendant opposed the application.
Issues
- Whether the application for execution of taxed bill of costs is competent
- Whether the rate of interest is valid
Reasoning
The court found the application incompetent as it did not comply with the requirements of filing a plaint and the rate of interest sought was not allowed.
Outcome
Dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs to the defendant
Authorities cited
Legislation (1)
- Advocates Remuneration Order
Cases cited (1)
- Sharma -vs- Uhuru Highway Development (2001) 2 E.A 530
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…