SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MALINDI HOLDINGS & another v COMMISSIONER OF LANDS & 5 others [2008] KEHC 91 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 91 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
91
Citation
[2008] KEHC 91 (KLR)
Decided
19 May 2008
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication to strike out the suitCoramN.R.O. OMBIJA
Holding

The suit is struck out as incurably defective and bad in law due to the plaintiffs' failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 13A of the Government Proceedings Act.

Facts

The plaintiffs (2nd and 4th defendants) seek orders to strike out the plaint and dismiss the suit against them with costs. The plaintiffs claim that the Commissioner of Lands purported to cause their land to be re-demarcated and granted a lease to the 2nd defendant, and carved out a portion for the 3rd defendant.

Issues

  1. Competence of the suit
  2. Fraud allegations
  3. Failure to comply with Government Proceedings Act

Reasoning

The plaintiff was served with the application dated 7th February 2008 and has failed to file grounds of opposition or replying affidavit. The plaintiff was duly served with the notice of preliminary objection by the advocate for the 1st, 5th and 6th defendants. The suit is thus incurably defective, bad in law and incapable of amendment.

Outcome

The suit is struck out.

Orders

  • The plaint herein by the plaintiff/respondent be struck out.
  • That in the result the suit against the applicant be dismissed with costs to the applicant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Government Proceedings Act (Cap 40) Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • THE TOWN COUNCIL OF OL KALOU V NG’ANG’A GENERAL STORE: CIVIL APPEAL NO.269 OF 1997
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case