SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ROMANUS ODHIAMBO OTIENO & PAMELA AWUOR OCHIENG v GEORGE OCHIENG OGONY (Civil Case 76’B’ of 2007) [2009] KEHC 18 (KLR) (12 October 2009) (Judgment)

[2009] KEHC 18 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
18
Citation
[2009] KEHC 18 (KLR)
Decided
12 October 2009
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Principal Magistrate's Court at MigoriCoramD. Musinga
Holding

The plaintiffs are the lawful registered proprietors of the suit property, Suna WEST/WASIMBETE/1305, and the defendant has no right over the same.

Facts

The plaintiffs purchased a portion of a parcel of land (SUNA WEST/WASIMBETE/855) from the joint registered proprietors, Ajwang Kathikiro and Akede Kathikiro, who had previously sold it to the plaintiffs. The defendant claimed the land was his and had a court decree from the Principal Magistrate's Court at Migori.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs acquired the suit land lawfully
  2. Whether the defendant has a right to the suit land

Reasoning

The plaintiffs acquired the suit land lawfully and the defendant's claim was based on a decree issued by a court that lacked jurisdiction.

Outcome

The plaintiffs are the lawful registered proprietors of the suit property, and the defendant is ordered to vacate the land within seven days.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to vacate the suit land within seven days.
  • The defendant is restrained from trespassing onto the suit land and interfering with the plaintiffs' occupation and enjoyment of the same.

Remedies

  • Eviction order if defendant fails to vacate the land within seven days.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Registered Land Act
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act
  • Minister of Lands (Appeals) Act
Cases cited (1)
  • WAMWEA V. CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF MURANG’A REGISTERED TRUSTEES [2003] KLR 389
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case