SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ARISTOCRATS CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED v MAVOKO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL [2009] KEHC 684 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 684 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
684
Citation
[2009] KEHC 684 (KLR)
Decided
18 September 2009
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from an order striking out the plaintiff's suitCoramR.N. NAMBUYE
Holding

The suit and proceedings are struck out due to the defect in the description of the defendant and the nullity of the proceedings.

Facts

The plaintiff, Aristocrats Concrete Company Limited, filed a suit against the defendant, Mavoko Municipal Council, alleging that the council had breached a memorandum of agreement by not remitting toll charges. The defendant denied construction of the road and claimed the agreement was void due to lack of ministerial approval.

Issues

  1. Validity of the memorandum of agreement
  2. Description of the defendant
  3. Nullity of the suit

Reasoning

The court found that the description of the defendant was defective and that the memorandum of agreement was null and void due to the lack of ministerial approval. The court also noted that the plaintiff's claim for goods supplied to the defendant could be distinct from the claim based on the memorandum or agreement.

Outcome

The suit and proceedings are struck out with costs to the defendant.

Orders

  • The suit and proceedings are struck out

Remedies

  • The plaintiff will be at liberty to revisit the drawing board, redraft the plaint, describe the defendant properly, seek leave to present the suit out of time, and thereafter proceed according to law.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case