SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC V THE EMBU LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL & another [2009] KEHC 983 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 983 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
983
Citation
[2009] KEHC 983 (KLR)
Decided
3 November 2009
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx-parte application for certiorari to quash proceedings and orders of the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Senior Principal Magistrate CourtCoramW. KARANJA
Holding

The Tribunal's order to subdivide the parcel of land and register it in the names of the plaintiff and defendant was ultra vires and null and void, and the proceedings and subsequent orders are quashed.

Facts

The ex-parte applicant sought to quash the proceedings and orders of the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Senior Principal Magistrate Court in a land dispute case involving the division of land and the registration of title deeds.

Issues

  1. The Land Disputes Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine the matter involving ownership of land.
  2. The Tribunal's order to subdivide a parcel of land and register it in the names of the plaintiff and defendant was ultra vires and null and void.

Reasoning

The Land Disputes Tribunal Act does not confer jurisdiction to the Tribunal to order the revocation, cancellation, rectification, or issuance of title deeds. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal is limited to matters of land boundaries, occupation, and trespass.

Outcome

The ex-parte applicant's application succeeds and the Tribunal's order is quashed.

Orders

  • The decision of the Land Disputes Tribunal dated 26/2/2002 and the decision of the Senior Principal Magistrate Court dated 19/9/2006 adopting the same are removed into this court for quashing and quashed.
  • Each party bears its own costs of this case.

Remedies

  • Quashing of the Tribunal's order and subsequent orders

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case