SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SIMON IMBAYI LUBIRA v SOCIETY OF TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL OF RWANDA [2010] KEHC 116 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 116 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
116
Citation
[2010] KEHC 116 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a dismissal of a suitCoramOuna, Visram
Holding

The court dismissed the application to release the deposit and ordered the defendant to apply for setting aside the judgment or pursue the application filed on the same so that the judgment can be set aside before considering the request to release the deposit.

Facts

The plaintiff, Simon Imbayi Lubira, was insured by UAP Provincial Insurance Company Limited for motor vehicle third-party risks. The defendant, Society of Transport International of Rwanda, was insured by Soras Insurance Company, a Rwandese Insurance Company. An ex-parte judgment was entered against the defendant on February 6, 2010, by Visram J. The parties agreed to set aside the ex-parte judgment on October 3, 2003, and the defendant deposited Kshs. 300,000 in a joint bank account.

Issues

  1. Whether the sum of Kshs. 300,000 deposited by the defendant should be released back to the defendant's advocates
  2. Whether the defendant should be granted costs

Reasoning

The court did not agree that the deposit should be released because the judgment in the plaintiff's favor still stands, and the deposit was made for security of that judgment.

Outcome

The application was dismissed

Orders

  • The sum of Kshs. 300,000 deposited by the defendant should not be released
  • The defendant should apply for setting aside the judgment or pursue the application filed on the same

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21 Laws of Kenya)
  • Insurance (Motor Vehicles 3rd party Risks) Act, Cap 403 laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case