SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

CORNELIUS WARUTERE V JUSTUS KIBUCHI GATURUHU [2010] KEHC 2249 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2249 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2249
Citation
[2010] KEHC 2249 (KLR)
Decided
11 June 2010
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an order dismissing a counter-claim and setting aside an ex parte judgmentCoramJ. K. SERGON
Holding

The Defendant's counsel's failure to note the hearing date in his diary is a genuine mistake and constitutes a good reason to set aside the exparte proceedings and judgment. The Defendant is ordered to pay the Plaintiff's thrown away costs of Ksh.10,000 within the next 30 days.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Cornelius Warutere, was granted leave to proceed for hearing ex parte on 28 July 2009, and judgment was entered in his favor against the Defendant, Justus Kibuchi Gaturuhu, on 26 August 2009. The Defendant now seeks to set aside the proceedings and judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant's counsel's failure to note the hearing date in his diary constitutes a good reason to set aside the exparte proceedings and judgment.
  2. Whether the Defendant's counsel's failure to inform the Defendant of the hearing date constitutes a good reason to set aside the exparte proceedings and judgment.

Reasoning

The court found that the Defendant's counsel's failure to note the hearing date in his diary was a genuine mistake, occurring daily in many offices. There is no evidence to suggest that the Defendant's counsel intentionally refused to inform the Defendant of the hearing date or refused to attend court.

Outcome

The Defendant's application to set aside the exparte proceedings and judgment is allowed.

Orders

  • The Defendant is ordered to pay the Plaintiff's thrown away costs of Ksh.10,000 within the next 30 days.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case