SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY v FRACA SERVCOM LTD [2010] KEHC 2825 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2825 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2825
Citation
[2010] KEHC 2825 (KLR)
Decided
29 April 2010
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil AppealPostureApplication for stay of proceedings and transfer of caseCoramP.M.MWILU
Holding

The application is granted and the case is transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega for hearing and final determination.

Facts

The Plaintiff ordinarily carries on business in Eldoret while the Defendant does its business at Kakamega. Goods were ordered for from Eldoret to be delivered to Kakamega.

Issues

  1. Whether the Eldoret court has jurisdiction over the case.
  2. Whether the case should be transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega to avoid unnecessary expense and inconvenience.

Reasoning

The Defendant's business is in Kakamega, and the performance of the contract took place there. The court in Eldoret has the jurisdiction to hear the case, but the Defendant has objected to the continuation of the case in Eldoret. The court in Kakamega is more appropriate due to the Defendant's business location and to avoid unnecessary expense.

Outcome

The Eldoret CM.CC.No.1019 of 2009 is transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega for hearing and final determination.

Orders

  • Eldoret CM.CC.No.1019 of 2009 is transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega for hearing and final determination.

Remedies

  • The case is transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega for hearing and final determination.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Order L Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • MATAYO K. KABOHA –VS- ABIBU BIN ABDULLA AND OTHERS (1936-51) 6 U.L.R 121
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case