SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ALTON HOMES LIMITED & ANOTHER v DAVIS NATHAN CHELOGOI & 2 OTHERS [2010] KEHC 37 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 37 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
37
Citation
[2010] KEHC 37 (KLR)
Decided
5 July 2010
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Land and Environmental Law Division, Civil Case (ELC) No.193 of 2010.CoramH. M. OKWENGU
Holding

The suit was properly initiated by a way of plaint and the court has jurisdiction to hear the case.

Facts

Alton Homes Limited and John Kangogo filed a suit against Davis Nathan Chelogoi, John Nduati Njuguna, and Samuel Kugega Ndegwa seeking various orders including a declaration that a sale and transfer of property was fraudulent and void, and orders for performance of agreements and damages.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit was properly initiated by a way of plaint.
  2. Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the case.
  3. Whether the plaintiffs' claim is a simple one requiring the determination of the rights of the parties to the contract of sale.

Reasoning

The court overruled the preliminary objection and ordered the parties to take a date for the hearing of the plaintiffs' motion.

Outcome

The plaintiffs' suit was not incompetent and fatally defective.

Orders

  • The parties to take a date for the hearing of the plaintiffs' motion.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Mukhisa Biscuits Manufacturing Company Ltd vs West End Distributors
  • Kenya Commercial Bank vs Osebe
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case