SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC v MINISTER, MINISTRY OF MEDICAL SERVICES [2011] KEHC 1294 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 1294 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1294
Citation
[2011] KEHC 1294 (KLR)
Decided
1 July 2011
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureEx parte application for leave to institute contempt proceedingsCoramD. Musinga
Holding

The court finds that the respondents are in contempt of court and orders them to be detained in prison for a period of six months or such period that the court may please.

Facts

The applicants, represented by Moses Collins Onono Lorre, sought orders of contempt against the Kenya Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Board (KMLTTB) and its members for disobeying court orders issued on 27th October, 2010, which prohibited the Board from conducting any business for 30 days or until further orders.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondents are in contempt of court
  2. Consequences of contempt
  3. Removal of transactions and businesses conducted by the respondents while in contempt

Reasoning

The court held that the respondents were fully aware of the existence of the court orders and proceeded to disobey them, thus constituting contempt.

Outcome

The court dismissed the preliminary objection and ordered the respondents to be detained in prison for six months.

Orders

  • Detention in prison for six months or such period that the court may please

Remedies

  • Nullification of all transactions and businesses conducted by the respondents while in contempt

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Board Act No. 10 of 1999
Cases cited (1)
  • HADKINSON v HADKINSON (1952) All ER 567
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case