SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MILIMANI SECURITY GUARDS LIMITED v THE PREBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY OF EAST AFRICA [2011] KEHC 4360 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 4360 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4360
Citation
[2011] KEHC 4360 (KLR)
Decided
2 December 2011
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureSummary Judgment MotionCoramG.K. KIMONDO
Holding

The court finds the defendant's defense to be hollow and a sham, and the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for Kshs 3,587,026.

Facts

The plaintiff, Milimani Security Guards Limited, claims Kshs 3,587,026 from the defendant, The Presbyterian University of East Africa, for security services provided to the Presbyterian College or University. The plaintiff alleges the defendant terminated the services in 2009, and the plaintiff was owed Kshs 2,807,384 in 2006.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant admitted the contractual relationship with the plaintiff
  2. Whether the defendant's defense is a good defense

Reasoning

The defendant admitted the contractual relationship with the plaintiff but did not specify the amount owed or provide a counterclaim. The court found the defense to be contradictory and evasive.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff for Kshs 3,587,026

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the plaintiff for Kshs 3,587,026
  • Award of costs of the motion and suit
  • Interest on the sums from the date of the decree till full payment

Remedies

  • Judgment for Kshs 3,587,026
  • Award of costs
  • Interest on the sums

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Magunga General Stores Vs Pepco Distributors Ltd (1987) 2 KAR 89
  • Osondo Vs Barclays Bank International Limited (1981) KLR 30
  • Momanyi Vs Hatimy (2003) 2 E.A. 600
  • American Cyanamid Co. Vs Ethicon Limited (1975) 1 ALL ER 504, [1975] AC 396
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case