SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

DATAGRUAD DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED V VIRGINIA NJERI KIGO & 3 OTHERS [2012] KEHC 1247 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 1247 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1247
Citation
[2012] KEHC 1247 (KLR)
Decided
6 November 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication for certification as extremely urgent and for security and attachmentCoramE. K. O. OGOLA
Holding

The 1st Defendant is ordered to furnish security in the sum of Kshs.43,000,000 within 7 days of the ruling, or an attachment of the properties mentioned in the application will be made before judgment.

Facts

The Plaintiff, a business entity, claims to have suffered a loss of Kshs.43,000,000 due to financial irregularities committed by the 1st Defendant, who was the accountant and predecessor of the Plaintiff. The 1st Defendant is alleged to have manipulated accounting systems, failed to document transactions, and misappropriated funds.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff has a prima facie case to succeed at the full trial of the issues raised in the Plaint.
  2. Whether the 1st Defendant should be required to furnish security and provide attachment of properties

Reasoning

The court finds the Plaintiff's fears well-founded and orders the 1st Defendant to provide security as the application is not opposed.

Outcome

The 1st Defendant is ordered to provide security and the properties mentioned in the application will be attached if the security is not provided.

Orders

  • The 1st Defendant to furnish security in the sum of Kshs.43,000,000 within 7 days of the ruling.
  • Attachment of the properties mentioned in the application if the security is not provided.

Remedies

  • Security in the sum of Kshs.43,000,000
  • Attachment of the properties mentioned in the application

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case