SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ABSOLOM AGALA V IMCO BUILDING & ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION [2012] KEHC 1341 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 1341 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1341
Citation
[2012] KEHC 1341 (KLR)
Decided
24 September 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a dismissal by the lower courtCoramB. THURANIRA JADEN
Holding

The appeal is partly successful. The appellant's claim for general damages is upheld, and the respondent's payment of Kshs.179,907/= is sufficient.

Facts

The appellant, Absolom Agala, was a mason working for the respondent, Imco Building & Engineering Construction. During work, he fell from a ladder, injuring his urethra. The appellant claimed damages for negligence, wrongful dismissal, job reinstatement, interests, and costs.

Issues

  1. The trial magistrate's failure to appreciate the nature of the claim
  2. The trial magistrate's dismissal of the suit as fluke and fictitious
  3. The trial magistrate's failure to consider the evidence and circumstances surrounding the accident
  4. The trial magistrate's apportionment of liability and assessment of damages

Reasoning

The court agreed with the trial magistrate's apportionment of liability on a 50-50 basis. The court awarded Kshs.175,000/= as general damages, which, when apportioned, comes to Kshs.87,500/=. The respondent's payment of Kshs.179,907/= is sufficient.

Outcome

Partially successful appeal

Orders

  • Each party to meet own costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Selle & Another v. Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd. & Others (1968) EA
  • MAGGERY WAMBUGU NAMU v. MR./MRS. NYAGA (NRI HCCC. NO. 821)
  • SHAUKA ABDUL RAZAK v. SALIM MOHAMMED (C.A MSA 6/90)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case