SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ROSA ADISA MAGALA v BONIFACE AMWAYI [2012] KEHC 141 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 141 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
141
Citation
[2012] KEHC 141 (KLR)
Decided
1 November 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court at Kakamega dismissing the plaintiff's suit for an injunction and an order directing the defendant to bury the deceased's remains.CoramSAID J. CHITEMBWE
Holding

The court finds that the defendant paid dowry to the plaintiff's family and that the deceased and the defendant were married, and orders that the defendant be given the deceased's body for burial at his ancestral home.

Facts

The plaintiff, Rosa Adisa Magala, seeks an injunction and an order directing the defendant, Boniface Amwayi, to bury the deceased, Everlyne Mwenesi Makala, on her land or at her ancestral home. The defendant claims the deceased was his first wife and that he should be given the body for burial at his ancestral home.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant paid dowry to the plaintiff's family
  2. Whether the deceased and the defendant were married

Reasoning

The court concludes that the defendant paid dowry to the plaintiff's family and that the deceased and the defendant were married, based on the long cohabitation and the principle of presumption of marriage. The court also considers the defendant's priority in issues relating to his wife under the Law of Succession Act.

Outcome

The plaintiff's suit is dismissed, and the defendant is ordered to be given the deceased's body for burial.

Orders

  • The body of the late Everlyne Mwenesi Makala be released to the defendant for burial at his ancestral home at Ebunasio in Ikolomani Division or any place of his choice.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • HOTTENSIAH WANJIRU YAWE VS PUBLIC TRUSTEE
  • BETH NYAMBURA KIMANI vs. JOYCE NYAKINYWA KIMANI and others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case