SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Kitui District Land Disputes Tribunal & 2 others Exparte Mbiti Kasango & another [2012] KEHC 1903 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 1903 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1903
Citation
[2012] KEHC 1903 (KLR)
Decided
8 October 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for Order of Judicial ReviewCoramLenaola
Holding

The Tribunal's decision is ultra vires, null and void due to lack of jurisdiction, and is quashed through certiorari.

Facts

The applicant, Mbiti Kasango and Sila Kasango, sought judicial review of the decision of the Kitui District Land Disputes Tribunal and the subsequent order of the Kitui Resident Magistrate. The application was opposed by the respondents, Kitui District Land Disputes Tribunal, Kitui Senior Resident Magistrate, and the Attorney General. Peter Musyoka Mwanzia was named as an interested party.

Issues

  1. Whether the Notice of Motion is incompetent.
  2. Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction.

Reasoning

The Tribunal's decision to award land to Peter Musyoka Mwanzia and advise the Land Registrar to give the land a number under that name was not within its jurisdiction as per Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990.

Outcome

The application is allowed, and the decision of the Kitui Resident Magistrate and the Kitui Land Disputes Tribunal is quashed through certiorari.

Orders

  • Quash the decision of the Kitui Resident Magistrate and the Kitui Land Disputes Tribunal through certiorari.
  • Costs to the ex parte applicants from the Interested Party.

Remedies

  • Quashing of the Tribunal's decision through certiorari.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case