SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Beauta Anselmo Maali v Ethiopian Airlines Enterprises [2012] KEHC 2329 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 2329 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2329
Citation
[2012] KEHC 2329 (KLR)
Decided
28 August 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a summary judgmentCoramLADY JUSTICE R.N. NAMBUYE- JA
Holding

The court allows Kshs.9,723,387.50 as loss of salary under prayer (a). Interest will run at court rates from the date of filing till payment in full. The plaintiff will have costs of the suit.

Facts

The plaintiff, Beauta Anselmo Maali, was an employee of Ethiopian Airlines Enterprises from 1973 to 2007. He was arrested and convicted in 2000 for converting company funds, leading to a criminal appeal. The plaintiff sought unpaid salaries, a declaration of continued employment, and other relief.

Issues

  1. Unpaid salaries
  2. Declaration of continued employment
  3. General damages for unlawful retention of salaries
  4. Costs of the suit
  5. Interest on unpaid salaries
  6. Life ticket
  7. Remedies for loss of salary

Reasoning

The court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to the loss of salary due to the conversion of company funds, as he was in the management cadre bracket and his retirement age was 60 years.

Outcome

The plaintiff is awarded Kshs.9,723,387.50 as loss of salary.

Orders

  • Allowance of Kshs.9,723,387.50 as loss of salary
  • Interest on the award at court rates from the date of filing till payment in full
  • Costs of the suit for the plaintiff
  • Retirement age for assessment of loss of salary to be 60 years instead of 55 years

Remedies

  • Loss of salary assessment
  • Interest on the award
  • Costs of the suit
  • Retirement age adjustment
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case